Authors: Dr Mehak Chadha, Dermatology Registrar; Dr Laura Savage, Consultant Dermatologist, Leeds Centre for Dermatology, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom (2025)
Peer reviewed by: Nancy Huang (MBChB), DermNet Medical Writer, New Zealand (2025)
Previous contributors: Vanessa Ngan, Staff Writer; Dr Amanda Oakley, Dermatologist, New Zealand (1997); Dr Abdulhadi Jfri, Dermatology Resident; Dr Elizabeth O’Brien, Assistant Professor of Dermatology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (2015)
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronicinflammatory skin disorder that affects apocrinegland-bearing skin, typically the axillae, groin, perianal region, buttocks, and inframammary folds. It is characterised by persistent, deep-seated, painful nodules and abscesses that can progress to sinus tract formation, purulentdischarge, and scarring.
Also known as acne inversa, this disorder can significantly impact quality of life and is associated with several disease-modifying comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome and psychiatric disorders.
Mild axillary HS showing scars and post-inflammatoryerythema
Marked comedones in axillary HS
Nodules and sinus formation in axillary HS
HS in the groins spreading down to the upper thighs
An acute painful inflammatory nodule in axillary HS
Severe axillary HS with scars and sinus formation
Submammary HS
Inflammatory HS in the groin with multiple painful nodules
Who gets hidradenitis suppurativa?
The global prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa is estimated to range from 0.1% to 4%. However, underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis likely mean that the actual prevalence is higher. Delayed diagnosis is also common.
HS typically presents following puberty by the second to third decades of life. Studies show that there is no racial predilection, although some surveys suggest it may be more common in African Americans.
Risk factors for the development of HS:
Sex — Female-to-male ratio of approximately 3:1 in Western countries, though perianal disease tends to be more common in men.
Family history — One-third of patients report an affected first-degree relative.
Obesity — Likely related to increased skin fold friction and chronic systemicinflammation; childhood obesity is correlated with a higher risk of early-onset HS.
Cigarette smoking — Possibly related to delayed wound healing and follicularocclusion due to nicotine and other components.
The exact cause of hidradenitis suppurativa is not fully understood. HS is described as an autoinflammatory syndrome, and its development is influenced by genetic, immune, hormonal, microbial, mechanical, and lifestyle factors. Hidradenitis suppurativa is not contagious, and it is not caused by poor hygiene.
The early pathogenesis of HS is thought to involve follicular occlusion and rupture, an abnormal innate immune response, and a subsequent inflammatory cascade.
Leukocytic infiltration, oedema, and bacterialdysbiosis within ruptured follicular units lead to inflammatory nodules and abscesses.
Persistent inflammation results in extensive fibrosis, and late signs of HS consist of epithelial-lined, pus-draining tunnels deep in the dermis.
What are the clinical features of hidradenitis suppurativa?
How is the severity of hidradenitis suppurativa assessed?
There are several severity scales to assess hidradenitis suppurativa clinically and academically.
Hurley Staging
This is the most commonly recognised clinical scoring system:
Stage I — Single or multiple abscesses without sinus tracts and scarring
Stage II — Recurrent abscesses with sinus tracts and scarring
Stage III — Diffuse or multiple interconnected sinus tracts and abscesses across the entire area
The Hurley staging system is not a dynamic means of assessment. Once a stage is reached, it cannot be downgraded due to the irreversibility of scarring with medical therapy.
International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4)
IHS4 is a dynamic scoring tool that can be particularly helpful in monitoring disease progression and response to treatment.
Number of nodules
x1
Number of abscesses
x2
Number of draining sinus tracts (fistulae/sinuses)
x4
The final score is calculated by the weighted sum of number of nodules, abscesses, and draining sinus tracts.
This score is made by counting involved regions, nodules, and sinus tracts. Its use has declined due to its complexity and the introduction of other measures such as the IHS4.
Anatomical regions involved: axilla, pectoral, inguinal/genital, intergluteal, buttocks
3 points for each region
Types of lesions
4 points for each abscess or draining fistula
2 points for each nodule
1 point for each scar
0.5 points for other changes (folliculitis, pustules)
Distance between lesions OR size of single lesion
8 points if >10 cm
4 points if 5-10 cm
2 points for <5 cm
0 points for ‘inactive’ disease
Are all lesions clearly separated by normal skin?
6 points for no
0 points for yes
The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL) score
The HiSQOL is used to consider the degree of pain, the number of flares, and the impact on daily life in hidradenitis suppurativa. This is a reliable and valid tool to measure HS-specific health-related quality of life.
The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR)
HiSCR is defined as a reduction in inflammatory lesion count (ie, abscesses, inflammatory nodules) and no increase in abscesses or draining fistulas, when compared with baseline.
It is predominantly used in clinical trials as a dichotomous outcome to assess the effectiveness of treatment with biologics. It has limited use in clinical practice.
The most commonly used scores are: HiSCR50, HiSCR75, and HiSCR90, representing a 50%, 75%, and 90% reduction in inflammatory lesion counts as compared to baseline, respectively.
What are the complications of hidradenitis suppurativa?
Hidradenitis suppurativa is primarily diagnosed clinically, based on the modified Dessau criteria. Diagnosis requires fulfilment of all three components:
Recurrence and chronicity of lesions (≥2 episodes over 6 months).
Diagnosis is supported by:
Positive family history of hidradenitis suppurativa
Negative microbiology swab of affected skin.
Biopsy is not typically needed, but it can help exclude other conditions eg, if there are features suggestive of squamous cell carcinoma. Histological features of HS include:
Follicular occlusion
Follicular hyperkeratosis
Follicular epithelial hyperplasia
Epidermal psoriasiform hyperplasia
Perifollicular inflammation.
Imaging is not necessary for diagnosis. However, ultrasound can help identify subclinical features, and MRI is useful for assessing complications and the extent of anogenital disease.
What is the differential diagnosis for hidradenitis suppurativa?
What is the treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa?
Optimal management of hidradenitis suppurativa requires a multidisciplinary team approach consisting of dermatology, general and/or plastic surgery, general practice, wound care management, dietetics, weight management services, and psychology.
Treatment should be tailored to each individual and follow local or regional management guidelines, where available.
General measures
Patient education with reassurance that the condition is not infectious nor a result of poor hygiene
Assess quality of life impact with HiSQOL, along with lesion count and frequency of flares
Record the Hurley Stage and consider immediate referral to secondary care dermatology for stage II-III disease
Oral clindamycin 300 mg BD and rifampicin 300 mg BD for up to 12 weeks.
Adjustments if the regimen is intolerable:
Clindamycin 150 mg OD and rifampicin 150 mg OD
Single-agent clindamycin 150 mg, OD or BD.
Used for severe disease (Hurley Stage III)
Also used if the tetracycline is not effective after 12 weeks or is not tolerated.
Intravenous antibiotics
IV ertapenem 1 g OD for 6 weeks.
Alternatively:
IV piperacillin/tazobactam 13.5 g total daily, for 6 weeks.
Used as rescue therapy for severe flares unresponsive to clindamycin plus rifampicin.
Also used as a bridging in severe disease prior to surgery.
Systemic treatments — Biologics
Biologics should be initiated in the case of inadequate disease control from the above treatments. Three biologics have been licensed for the treatment of HS: adalimumab, secukinumab, and bimekizumab.
BE HEARD I and BE HEARD II phase 3 clinical trials showed that 48-52% of patients achieved HiSCR50 with two weekly dosing, compared to 29-32% with placebo at week 16.
Adverse events over two years of treatment included oral candidiasis (12.0%), hepatic events (ALT or AST elevations >3 x ULN in 10.7%), and injection site reactions (5.9%).
Surgery is an effective treatment that should be used in combination with lifestyle and medical intervention. Small nodules are ideally addressed early to prevent rupture of blocked follicles and the subsequent development of chronic, interconnecting sinus tracts.
It is usually safe to continue biological treatments whilst undergoing surgery, but specialist surgical opinion should be sought on an individual basis.
This may improve pain and slow disease progression by destroying the folliculo-sebaceous unit, thereby reducing follicular blockage and decreasing bacterial presence.
What is the outcome for hidradenitis suppurativa?
Hidradenitis suppurativa is a genetically driven, chronic scarring condition that can significantly impair quality of life if left untreated. Spontaneous remission or reduced inflammation may occur over time (eg, after menopause in women), although scarring persists. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to minimise lasting damage.
Alikhan A, et al. North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part I: Diagnosis, evaluation, and the use of complementary and procedural management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jul;81(1):76-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.067. Journal
Cartron A, Driscoll MS. Comorbidities of hidradenitis suppurativa: A review of the literature. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019 Jul 2;5(5):330-334. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.06.026. Journal
Ingram JR, et al. Unmet clinical needs and burden of disease in hidradenitis suppurativa: real-world experience from EU5 and US. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18163.Journal
Jfri A, Nassim D, O'Brien E, Gulliver W, Nikolakis G, Zouboulis CC. Prevalence of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Aug 1;157(8):924-931. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1677. Journal
J.R. Ingram, et al. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa) 2018, British Journal of Dermatology, Volume 180, Issue 5, 1 May 2019, Pages 1009–1017. doi:10.1111/bjd.17537. Journal
Krueger JG, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: new insights into disease mechanisms and an evolving treatment landscape. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jan 23;190(2):149-162. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad345. Journal
Martorell A, et al. Defining hidradenitis suppurativa phenotypes based on the elementary lesion pattern: results of a prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1309-1318. doi:10.1111/jdv.16183. Journal
Nguyen T, Damiani G, Orenstein LA, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: an update on epidemiology, phenotypes, diagnosis, pathogenesis, comorbidities and quality of life. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2021;35(1):50-61. doi:10.1111/jdv.16677. Journal
Smith SDB, Okoye GA, Sokumbi O. Histopathology of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review. Dermatopathology (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;9(3):251-257. doi:10.3390/dermatopathology9030029. Journal
Zouboulis CC, et al. European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 May;39(5):899-941. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20472. Journal