Author: George Zhang, Medical Student, University of Auckland. DermNet New Zealand Editor in Chief: Hon A/Prof Amanda Oakley, Dermatologist, Hamilton, New Zealand. Copy editor: Maria McGivern. April 2017.
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is a technique used in the laboratory to diagnose diseases of the skin, kidney, and other organ systems. It is also called the direct immune fluorescent test or primary immunofluorescence.
DIF involves the application of antibody–fluorophoreconjugatemolecules to samples of patient tissue obtained from biopsies. These antibody–fluorophore conjugates target abnormal depositions of proteins in the patient’s tissue. When exposed to light, the fluorophore emits its own frequency of light, seen with a microscope. The particular staining pattern and type of abnormal proteindeposition seen in the tissue sample help diagnose the disease.
Direct immunofluorescence for the diagnosis of skin diseases
DIF is useful in the diagnosis of suspected autoimmune disease, connective tissue diseases and vasculitis. The staining patterns seen in tissue samples may be specific to a disease entity or they may need to be interpreted with the clinical and histological findings.
The optimal site for taking a biopsy of the skin depends on the suspected disease.
Autoimmunebullous diseases: take normal-appearing perilesional skin less than 1 cm from a bulla. As false-negative results may arise from samples from the lower extremities, avoid these sites if possible.
Connective tissue diseases: the biopsy should be taken from an established lesion (often in sun-exposed areas), ideally that is more than 6 months old but still active. An additional specimen is often taken in a sun-protected site.
Vasculitis: for best results, take a punch biopsy or a deep-shave biopsy of a lesion that is less than 24 hours old.
Another biopsy is usually taken for routine haematoxylin–eosin (H&E) histology. Note that the optimal biopsy site and timeframe required differs for these examples.
Autoimmune bullous diseases: remove an entire vesicle or biopsy the edge of a bulla.
Vasculitis: select a purpuric lesion of fewer than 72 hours duration.
Transport and storage of the biopsy sample
Specimens for DIF should not be placed in formalin, as this alters proteins and significantly diminishes the accuracy of results. Transport the specimen to the laboratory as soon as possible. Options for transporting the sample include:
Placed on a saline-soaked gauze
In saline solution
In special media (eg, Michel or Zeus media)
Frozen in liquid nitrogen (the specimen should not be allowed to thaw).
Each laboratory has its own protocols. Specimens in saline may yield superior sensitivity over other media if processed within 24–48 hours.
What happens to the specimen in the laboratory?
DIF may be carried out in an automated machine or manually. The process involves first making frozen sections then carrying out immunofluorescence.
Preparing frozen sections
A punch biopsy is transported to the lab on saline-soaked gauze.
The specimen is placed in a gel.
Liquid nitrogen is used to freeze the specimen and gel.
The frozen specimen is contained within the frozen gel.
The specimen can be stored in liquid nitrogen for about one week.
4–6 micron thick slices are cut.
Punch biopsy on saline-soaked gauze
Specimen in gel
Liquid nitrogen storage
Frozen specimen
Specimen in liquid nitrogen
Cutting thin slices of skin
Carrying out direct immunofluorescence
Five or six slides are made; each for a different reagent. One slide will be used for a normal H&E stain.
A special pen is used to draw a perimeter to keep reagents within the slides.
The slides are washed.
The reagents are made up.
The reagents (antibody–fluorophore conjugates to IgG, IgM, IgA, complement protein C3, and when required fibrinogen) are dropped onto the slides and the slides are left for some time in the dark.
The slides are washed again in solution.
Glass covers are placed over the slides.
Five slides are made
A special pen is used
Slides washed in solution
Making up reagents
The reagents
Reagent dropped on slides
Wash in solution
Prepare for cover slip
Glass cover
Interpretation of direct immunofluorescence
The prepared immunofluorescence slides are examined by a pathologist to determine the primary sites of immune deposition (if any), the classes of immunoglobulin or other immune deposits, and the patterns of deposition. Staining patterns can be classed into five groups:
Intercellular surface staining (ICS) pattern
Linearbasement membrane zone (BMZ) pattern
Granular BMZ pattern
Shaggy BMZ pattern
Vascular and other patterns.
Pemphigus vulgaris
Pemphigus foliaceus
Bullous pemphigoid
C3 on basement membrane zone
Vascular staining
Linear IgA bullous dermatosis
Examples of staining patterns
Intercellular space staining pattern (chicken-wire), pemphigus vulgaris.
Intercellular space staining pattern (chicken-wire), pemphigus foliaceus.
Linear IgG deposition on basement membrane zone, bullous pemphigoid.
Linear IgA deposition on basement membrane zone, linear IgA bullous dermatosis.
Vascular staining pattern in dermal vessels for IgM.
How reliable are direct immunofluorescence results?
DIF testing is moderately sensitive in detecting a range of diseases. The sensitivity for DIF approaches 100% for the pemphigus group of diseases, and sensitivity has been reported to be 55–96% for bullous pemphigoid. A study of ten patients with Henoch–Schönlein purpura and nine with lupus erythematosus demonstrated positive DIF testing in all of the patients.
The number of false-negative results with DIF depends on the quality of the sample, laboratory processing, and whether or not the patient has been on treatment. Reasons for false-negative results include:
An incorrect site of biopsy
Lack of epidermis in biopsy and other technical errors
Prolonged storage of specimen before transport to the laboratory
Photobleaching and other laboratory errors
The patient is on active immune-modulating treatment.
References
Mutasim DF, Adams BB. Immunofluorescence in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45: 803–24. DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.117518. ResearchGate
Elston DM, Stratman EJ, Miller SJ. Skin biopsy: Biopsy issues in specific diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74: 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.033. PubMed
Kalaaji AN, Nicolas ME. Mayo Clinic Atlas of immunofluorescence in dermatology: patterns and target antigens. Rochester: Mayo Clinic Scientific Press, 2006.
Buch AC, Kumar H, Panicker N, Misal S, Sharma Y, Gore CR. A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses. Indian J Dermatol 2014; 59: 364–8. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.135488. PubMed Central