Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis (PPV) is a rare congenitalsyndrome, predominantly consisting of a vascularmalformation and dermal melanosis.
PPV is a mosaic abnormality of vasomotor nerves and melanocytes resulting in its characteristic cutaneousmanifestations. A small proportion of patients have associated systemic features.
Who gets phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
Due to its rarity, the prevalence is currently unknown. It is thought to be more common in those of Asian ethnicity. There is some overlap with Klippel-Trenaunay and Sturge-Weber syndromes.
What causes phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
PPV is a mosaic developmentalabnormality of the vasomotor nerves and melanocytes (derived from the neural crest).
It is caused by sporadic mutations in GNA11 and GNAQgenes, which encode Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. These genetic mutations have been detected in affected tissues, but undetectable in the blood, suggesting it is a post-zygotic mosaic disorder.
What are the clinical features of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
There are five types of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis. These are distinguished based on cutaneous signs. Each type is further divided into subtypes A and B, depending on whether there is systemic involvement (as evident in subtype B). Type ll is the most common (port-wine stain with dermal melanosis).
Table 1. Types of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis
Type
Clinical features
I
Capillary malformation, epidermalnaevus
II (Cesioflammea)
Capillary malformation, dermal melanosis (lumbosacral dermal melanocytosis, nevus of Ota)
Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis has been associated with a variety of systemic abnormalities. These are only present in a small proportion of patients.
How do clinical features vary in differing types of skin?
Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis is most common in the darker skin types seen in Asian ethnicities. The dermal melanosis presents as a blue/grey pigmentation and can be mistaken for bruising. The erythema associated with vascular malformations can be less prominent in darker skin types.
What are the complications of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
The complications associated with phakomatosis pigmentovascularis depend on any associated systemic involvement.
Complications can include:
Visual impairment
Seizures
Intellectual impairment
Hearing impairment
Back pain
Impaired mobility.
How is phakomatosis pigmentovascularis diagnosed?
Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis is a clinical diagnosis based on the combination of the associated cutaneous findings.
Specific genetic analysis of affected tissues can be performed.
What is the differential diagnosis for phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
What is the treatment for phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
Cutaneous involvement
No treatment is required for the capillary malformation or dermal melanosis. If treatment is desired for cosmetic reasons, laser treatment can be used, such as:
Other screening tests and referrals depending on clinical findings.
What is the outcome for phakomatosis pigmentovascularis?
The recurrence risk of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis in subsequent pregnancies is close to zero given it is associated with a mosaic issue and normal egg and sperm. This is true for both the parents of the affected child and the affected child’s future offspring.
Bibliography
Fernández-Guarino M, Boixeda P, de Las Heras E, Aboin S, García-Millán C, Olasolo PJ. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis: Clinical findings in 15 patients and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(1):88–93. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.012. Journal
Happle R. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis revisited and reclassified. Arch Dermatol.2005;141(3):385–8. doi:10.1001/archderm.141.3.385. PubMed
Shin H, Kim YG, Kim YE, Park H. Clinical characteristics and treatment of 52 cases of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis. J Dermatol. 2019;46(10):843–8. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.15035. Journal
Thomas AC, Zeng Z, Rivière JB, et al. Mosaic Activating Mutations in GNA11 and GNAQ Are Associated with Phakomatosis Pigmentovascularis and Extensive Dermal Melanocytosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(4):770–8. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2015.11.027. PubMed