Mycosis fungoides is the commonest type of primarycutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterised clinically by progression from patches to plaques to tumours and, on histology, by an epidermotropic infiltrate of small to medium-sized CD4+ T-cells (lymphocytes).
Patches and plaques of mycosis fungoides
Plaque stage mycosis fungoides
Mycosis fungoides histology
Who gets mycosis fungoides?
Mycosis fungoides (MF) represents 50% of all primary cutaneouslymphomas and 60-70% of all cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). However, it is an uncommon condition with an estimated incidence worldwide of 6.4 per million.
Onset is usually in late adulthood (median age 55–60 years) with a male predominance (2:1) in white patients. Diagnosis in patients under 30 years of age is highest in Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Black Americans.
What causes mycosis fungoides?
The aetiopathogenesis of mycosis fungoides remains unknown. Theories include chronicantigen stimulation, a geneticpredisposition (eg, HLA type), or chemical exposure (eg, medications). Geographical clustering of cases and MF affecting family members suggests environmental triggers. Unlike some forms of CTCL, there is no evidence currently for a viral aetiology.
What are the clinical features of mycosis fungoides?
Mycosis fungoides can present as a chronic itch, even before there are clinical signs of disease. Classic MF progresses slowly over years from patches to plaques and may eventually form tumours. Most patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease.
Patch stage
Poorly defined, irregular, finely scaling, red patches of variable size often with atrophic (thin, wrinkled) skin
Occurs mainly on sun-protected sites particularly the lower trunk, thighs and, in women, the breasts
Often asymptomatic
Hypopigmented variant: pale, finely scaly patches without atrophy in children and Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI
Poikiloderma atrophicans vasculare is atrophic patch stage MF presenting with skin thinning, pigment changes, and dilation of capillaries (telangiectasia)
Patch stage mycosis fungoides
Patch stage mycosis fungoides
Patch stage mycosis fungoides
Mycosis fungoides
Plaque stage
Well-demarcatedannular or arciform itchy thickened lesions
Colour often red, violaceous, or brown, sometimes scaly
Individual plaques can become quite large with central regression
May develop from patches or de novo
Initially involves less than 10% of the body surface area (BSA), becoming widespread later
Plaque stage mycosis fungoides
Plaque stage mycosis fungoides
Plaque stage mycosis fungoides
Tumour stage
Large irregular lumps (>1 cm) developing from plaques
Deep red to violaceous colour, often shiny surface
Tumour stage mycosis fungoides
Tumour stage mycosis fungoides
Tumour stage mycosis fungoides
Mycosis fungoides
Non-classic clinical presentations of mycosis fungoides
There are many clinical presentations that do not look like classic mycosis fungoides but follow the same natural history including:
Mycosis fungoides is the most common primary cutaneous lymphoma (65%) in children but diagnosis is often delayed (2–5 years). The mean age at diagnosis is 10 years, and the sexes are affected almost equally. Most children present with non-classic and often multiple variants. More than 50% of children present with the hypopigmented variant of MF; classic MF affects 40%, and folliculotropic MF in one-third.
How do clinical features vary in differing types of skin?
Mycosis fungoides in skin of colour often presents as hypopigmented papules and plaques without epidermal atrophy. A large case series from Johns Hopkins reported Black American males presented with later stage disease and greater skin involvement than white Americans; Black American females had early-onset aggressive disease. Patients with hypopigmented lesions were more likely to have early-stage disease and better survival than those with advanced-stage disease in another US series.
Dermoscopy of mycosis fungoides
Classic patch stage mycosis fungoides
Vessels
Fine short linear
Spermatozoan vascular structures - highly specific
Scale - white
Colour - yellow-orange
Follicular changes - not seen
Poikilodermatous mycosis fungoides
Polygonal structures - lobules of white storiform streaks and fine red dots or hairpin vessels
Reticular brown septa - unevenly or intermittently distributed pigmented dots
Dotted and glomerular vessels
Red-yellow smudges, pink-white background
Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides
Early change - white perifollicular halos of variable sizes
Late change - comedo-like openings
Hypopigmented mycosis fungoides
Short linear spermatozoa-like vessels
Focal white scale
Brown-yellow structures
Broken pigment network
Whitish background
Erythrodermic mycosis fungoides
Dotted, linear irregular, and spermatozoan vessels
Brown structureless areas
Perifollicular flesh-coloured circles, radial or concentric vessels
Trichoscopy - also white interfollicular scale, numerous grey dots
What are the complications of mycosis fungoides?
Ulceration of plaques and tumours, with secondary bacterialinfection
Extracutaneous spread – to lymph nodes and, rarely, internal organs including lungs, nasopharynx, bones, and CNS
Erythrodermic mycosis fungoides — unlike Sézary syndrome there are no/few circulating ‘Sézary cells’ in the peripheral blood
Sézary syndrome can sometimes be preceded by mycosis fungoides
Transformation to large cell lymphoma
Other forms of lymphoma, skin cancers, and internal malignancies
Impact on quality of life — anxiety and depression due to uncertainty about disease progression, and the economic burden of chronic disease
How is mycosis fungoides diagnosed?
The diagnosis of mycosis fungoides requires careful clinicopathological correlation. Dermoscopy can help to distinguish MF from inflammatorydermatosis, other causes of erythroderma, and leprosy (see Dermoscopy of leprosy).
Multiple skin biopsies are often required over time to confirm the diagnosis especially in the early stages. Histopathology is characterised by infiltrates of malignant CD4+ T-cells (see Mycosis fungoides pathology).
Further investigations performed on skin biopsy specimens may include:
Blood tests, lymph node biopsy, and imaging (eg, CT/PET scans) may be required if there is concern the skin lesions are secondary to a systemic lymphoma, in advanced disease (ie, extracutaneous spread), or for TNMB staging.
Plaques and tumours — malignancies including other cutaneous lymphomas
What is the treatment for mycosis fungoides?
Mycosis fungoides is treatable, not curable. There are no globally accepted treatment guidelines. Treatment should be guided by the patient’s wishes, stage of disease, availability of options, and local expertise. Disease relapse is common after most treatments. A wait-and-see approach can be considered for early limited disease.
Other therapies — including denileukin diftitox, monoclonalantibodies, histone deacetylase inhibitors
Only brentuximab vedotin (for CD30+ MF) and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant alter the natural history of the disease.
What is the outcome for mycosis fungoides?
Mycosis fungoides typically follows an indolent course over years, with an estimated 5-year survival of 87%. The duration of early-stage disease has been estimated to be approximately 18 years. Although improved survival with MF has been demonstrated, it is likely due to earlier diagnosis rather than advances in therapy.
Individual lesions can sometimes remit spontaneously.
Age, skin stage, and the presence/absence of extracutaneous disease are the major predictors of survival. Skin stage T1 disease (limited patches/plaques) does not alter life-expectancy, although approximately one-third of patients with skin stage T1 disease progress to more advanced stages.
Hypopigmented and poikilodermatous variants have reduced disease progression and better disease-specific survival compared to classic MF while folliculotropic, pustular, and granulomatous MF are considered to be more aggressive variants.
The most common cause of death is non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which is usually the mycosis fungoides but can be a second NHL, with non-NHL malignancy being the second most common.
Bibliography
Bontoux C, Badrignans M, Afach S, et al. Pustular mycosis fungoides has a poor outcome: a multicentric clinicopathological and molecular case series. Br J Dermatol. 2024;192(1):125-134. doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae312. Journal
Dobos G, Pohrt A, Ram-Wolff C, et al. Epidemiology of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 16,953 patients. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(10):2921. doi:10.3390/cancers12102921. Journal
Elghawy O,Sussman JH,Yang AG, et al. Pembrolizumab in Relapsed or Refractory Mycosis Fungoides or Sézary Syndrome. JAMA Dermatol. 2025;161(6):656–658. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.0251. Journal
Geller S, Lebowitz E, Pulitzer MP, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in African American and black patients with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: retrospective analysis of 157 patients from a referral cancer center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(2):430–9. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.073. PubMed
Kaufman AE, Patel K, Goyal K, et al. Mycosis fungoides: developments in incidence, treatment and survival. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(10):2288-94. doi:10.1111/jdv.16325. PubMed Central
Lovgren ML, Scarisbrick JJ. Update on skin directed therapies in mycosis fungoides. Chin Clin Oncol. 2019;8(1):7. doi:10.21037/cco.2018.11.03. Journal
Maguire A, Puelles J, Raboisson P, Chavda R, Gabriel S, Thornton S. Early-stage mycosis fungoides: epidemiology and prognosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(1):adv00013. doi:10.2340/00015555-3367. Journal
Muñoz-González H, Molina-Ruiz AM, Requena L. Clinicopathologic variants of mycosis fungoides. Variantes clínico-patológicas de micosis fungoide. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108(3):192–208. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2016.08.009. Journal